Home > child care, Feminisms > bell hooks, “Feminist Parenting”

bell hooks, “Feminist Parenting”

November 22, 2010 Leave a comment Go to comments

“Feminist Parenting”

bell hooks

Chapter 13, Feminism is for Everybody, South End Press, 2000. [PDF]

Feminist focus on children was a central component of contemporary radical feminist movement. By raising children without sexism women hoped to create a future world where there would be no need for an anti-sexist movement. Initially the focus on children primarily highlighted sexist sex roles and the way in which they were imposed on children from birth on. Feminist attention to children almost always focused on girl children, on attacking sexist biases and promoting alternative images. Now and then feminists would call attention to the need to raise boys in an anti-sexist manner but for the most part the critique of male patriarchy, the insistence that all men had it better than all women, trickled down. The assumption that boys always had more privilege and power than girls fueled feminists prioritizing a focus on girls.

One of the primary difficulties feminist thinkers faced when confronting sexism within families was that more often than not female parents were the transmitters of sexist thinking. Even in households where no adult male parental caregiver was present, women taught and teach children sexist thinking. Ironically, many people assume that any female-headed household is automatically matriarchal. In actuality women who head households in patriarchal society often feel guilty about the absence of a male figure and are hypervigilant about imparting sexist values to children, especially males. In recent times mainstream conservative pundits have responded to a wellspring of violent acts by young males of all classes and races by suggesting that single women cannot possible raise a healthy male child. This is just simply not true. The facts show that some of the most loving and powerful men in our society were raised by single mothers. Again it must be reiterated that most people assume that a woman raising children alone, especially sons, will fail to teach a male child how to become a patriarchal male. This is simply not the case.

Within white supremacist capitalist patriarchal cultures of domination children do not have rights. Feminist movement was the first movement for social justice in this society to call attention to the fact that ours is a culture that does not love children, that continues to see children as the property of parents to do with as they will. Adult violence against children is a norm in our society. Problematically, for the most part feminist thinkers have never wanted to call attention to the reality that women are often the primary culprits in everyday violence against children simply because they are the primary parental caregivers. While it was crucial and revolutionary that feminist movement called attention to the fact that male domination in the home often creates an autocracy where men sexually abuse children, the fact is that masses of children are daily abused verbally and physically by women and men. Maternal sadism often leads women to emotionally abuse children, and feminist theory has not yet offered both feminist critique and feminist intervention when the issue is adult female violence against children.

In a culture of domination where children have no civil rights, those who are powerful, adult males and females, can exert autocratic rule of children. All the medical facts show that children are violently abused daily in this society. Much of that abuse is life threatening. Many children die. Women perpetuate this violence as much as men if not more. A serious gap in feminist thinking and practice has been the refusal of the movement to confront head-on adult female violence against children. Emphasizing male domination makes it easy for women, including feminist thinkers, to ignore the ways women abuse children because we have all been socialized to embrace patriarchal thinking, to embrace an ethics of domination which says the powerful have the right to rule over the powerless and can use any means to subordinate them. In the hierarchies of white supremacist capitalist patriarchy, male domination of females is condoned, but so is adult domination of children. And no one really wants to call attention to mothers who abuse.

Often I tell the story of being at a fancy dinner party where a woman is describing the way she disciplines her young son by pinching him hard, clamping down on his little flesh for as long as it takes to control him. And how everyone applauded her willingness to be a disciplinarian. I shared the awareness that her behavior was abusive, that she was potentially planting the seeds for this male child to grow up and be abusive to women. Significantly, I told the audience of listeners that if we had heard a man telling us how he just clamps down on a woman’s flesh, pinching her hard to control her behavior it would have been immediately acknowledged as abusive. Yet when a child is being hurt this form of negative domination is condoned. This is not an isolated incident – much more severe violence against children is enacted daily by mothers and fathers.

Indeed the crisis the children of this nation face is that patriarchal thinking clashing with feminist changes is making the family even more of a war zone than it was when male domination was the norm in every household. Feminist movement served as the catalyst, uncovering and revealing the grave extent to which male sexual abuse of children has been and is taking place in the patriarchal family. It started with grown women in feminist movement receiving therapeutic care acknowledging that they were abuse survivors and bringing this acknowledgment out of the private realm of therapy into public discourse. These revelations created the positive ethical and moral context for children to confront abuse taking place in the present. However, simply calling attention to male sexual abuse of children has not created the climate where masses of people understand that this abuse is linked to male domination, that it will end only when patriarchy is eliminated. Male sexual abuse of children happens more often and is reported more often than female abuse, but female sexual coercion of children must be seen as just as horrendous as male abuse. And feminist movement must critique women who abuse as harshly as we critique male abuse. Beyond the realm of sexual abuse, violence against children takes many forms; the most commonplace forms are acts of verbal and psychological abuse.

Abusive shaming lays the foundation for other forms of abuse. Male children are often subjected to abuse when their behavior does not conform to sexist notions of masculinity. They are often shamed by sexist adults (particularly mothers) and other children. When male parental caregivers embody anti-sexist thought and behavior boys and girls have the opportunity to see feminism in action. When feminist thinkers and activists provide children with educational arenas where anti-sexist biases are not the standards used to judge behavior, boys and girls are able to develop healthy self-esteem.

One of the most positive interventions feminist movement made on behalf of children was to create greater cultural awareness of the need for men to participate equally in parenting not just to create gender equity but to build better relationships with children. Future feminist studies will document all the ways anti-sexist male parenting enhances the lives of children. Concurrently, we need to know more about feminist parenting in general, about the practical ways one can raise a child in an anti-sexist environment, and most importantly we need to know more about what type of people the children who are raised in these homes become.

Visionary feminist activists have never denied the importance and value of male parental caregivers even as we continually work to create greater cultural appreciation of motherhood and the work done by women who mother. A disservice is done to all females when praise for male participation in parenting leads to disparagement and devaluation of the positive job of mothering women do. At the beginning of feminist movement feminists were harsh critics of mothering, pitting that task against careers which were deemed more liberating, more self-affirming. However, as early as the mid-’80s some feminist thinkers were challenging feminist devaluation of motherhood and the overvaluation of work outside the home. Writing on this subject in Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center I made the point that:

Working within a social context where sexism is still the norm, where there is unnecessary competition promoting envy, distrust, antagonism, and malice between individuals, makes work stressful, frustrating, and often totally unsatisfying … many women who like and enjoy the wage work they do feel that it takes too much of their time, leaving little space for other satisfying pursuits. While work may help women gain a degree of financial independence or even financial self-sufficiency, for most women it has not adequately fulfilled human needs. As a consequence women’s search for fulfilling labor done in an environment of care has led to reemphasizing the importance of family and the positive aspects of motherhood.

Ironically just when feminist thinkers had worked to create a more balanced portrait of mothering patriarchal mainstream culture launched a vicious critique of single-parent, female-headed households. That critique was most harsh when it came to the question of welfare. Ignoring all the data which shows how skillfully loving single mothers parent with very little income whether they receive state assistance or work for a wage, patriarchal critiques call attention to dysfunctional female-headed households, act as though these are the norm, then suggest the problem can be solved if men were in the picture as patriarchal providers and heads of households.

No anti-feminist backlash has been as detrimental to the well-being of children as societal disparagement of single mothers. In a culture which holds the two-parent patriarchal family in higher esteem than any other arrangement, all children feel emotionally insecure when their family does not measure up to the standard. A utopian vision of the patriarchal family remains intact despite all the evidence which proves that the well-being of children is no more secure in the dysfunctional male-headed household than in the dysfunctional female-headed household. Children need to be raised in loving environments. Whenever domination is present love is lacking. Loving parents, be they single or coupled, gay or straight, headed by females or males, are more likely to raise healthy, happy children with sound self-esteem. In future feminist movement we need to work harder to show parents the ways ending sexism positively changes family life. Feminist movement is pro-family. Ending patriarchal domination of children, by men or women, is the only way to make the family a place where children can be safe, where they can be free, where they can know love.

Categories: child care, Feminisms
  1. angel macedon
    October 10, 2011 at 1:17 pm

    Being a survivor,barely, of massive abuse, psychological and physical at the hands of my mother and other women in my life over the years, i can say with conviction, i see no reason or benefit in raising children as feminists as a way of remedying dv or abuse in families. My mother, a self described feminists, used her victimization, and the abhorrent values of Black America on parenting and corporal punishment, as a shield from to hide her own abusive behaviour; something i see blackwomen do all too frequently. Yes blackmen do it too, but men are allowed far less leeway than blackwomen are in this discussion. As you mentioned, often the excuse is made that it is ok for single moms because of the constant proximity to the children; what bullshit. Should it then be ok to hit a woman because you with her all the itme? As a single father of two boys and one girl, i taught my children that no one, not me or their mother, had the right to abuse them physically or otherwise. Their mom felt and behaved differently— even though she had suffered chronic abuse from her domineering , controling, shoe throwing mother. On the issues of dv, rape and abuse, Feminism has dropped the ball and has no credibility as far as i am concerned. How can someone who ignores the violence of lesbians against women and all of the aforementioned abuse of children and men at the hands of women be trusted? Right now, as you read this, some lesbian or man is being turned away from his community because he complained about female violence. There is little that is more cowardly as pointing a finger at others when you behave in the same manner. This bs that feminism has serverd up for the last 40 years about men, all men, being monsters and women being noble victims is a joke. The secret violence and emasculation of our boys and men, by in your face black mothers, women and culture at large is the problem, not some nebulous, broadly defined patriarchy. Even though women have demanded that men stay home and help raise the children, she see’s herself as being in charge of the nursery and expects to be the last word. Men who do stay home find they are isolated and viewded with suspicsion at the places where women and children gather and are viewed as helpers to the mom. This yet another reason to be suspicsious of feminist demands and criticisms of men. As a man who made the decision to be the primary care giver, over time my wife found me to be less sexually atractive then before because i “wasn’t caring a briefcase”. And my sexuality was brought into question also. Yeah, thanks feminism.

  2. April 7, 2013 at 7:46 pm

    angel macedeon: Your wife questioning your sexuality because you were not carrying a briefcase and because you were caring for the children is PRECISELY what is being talked about in this chapter. THOSE ARE sexist stereotypes, that men should be the working, briefcase carrying alpha, that men who care for their children are somehow not masculine or must be gay?? These are the exact things that feminism SHOULD be challenging and does challenge and anyone who describes themselves as a feminist without doing so is thoroughly misinformed or misguided. The problem is most definitely not with feminism, it is with the lack of success in challenging these sexist ideas which are part of patriarchal culture.

    I am also sorry to hear you suffered abuse at the hands of a violent “feminist” mother, but again, her actions were going against her supposed feminist ideals. Her actions were domineering and wrong and patriarchal. I don’t see how you can say that feminism ignores certain types of abuse, at the hands of women, when this article is written by a feminist, from a feminist viewpoint, and is specifically talking about those forms of abuse.

    Feminism is not about “all men being monsters”, and being against patriarchy does not mean that we blame all men for its existence either.

  1. February 4, 2015 at 11:59 am
  2. May 22, 2015 at 6:54 am
  3. November 2, 2015 at 6:45 am
  4. October 17, 2017 at 8:43 am
  5. October 17, 2017 at 8:43 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: